06 Hyper Pro vs Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2 Comparison

Car Information

/

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

/

/

192

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

5 Seater

4350

4.395

1820

1.795

1625

1.562

2640

2.655

/

430

Fuel Economy

15

16.7

51

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

10.25

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

7DCT

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L

2.0 L

181 BHP

155 BHP

7DCT

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

L

/

1.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

Turbocharge

/

4

/

181 BHP

155 BHP

133

/

5500

/

290

200

2000-3500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 06 Hyper Pro

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick06 Hyper Pro

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 06 Hyper Pro if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2 if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Geely | EX5 Pro

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Hongqi | HS3 1.5T Luxury

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Peugeot | 2008 GT

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

JAC | JS6 Flagship

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Jetour | X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 06 Hyper Pro has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2 has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 06 Hyper Pro has a wheelbase of 2640, while Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2 has a wheelbase of 2.655. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 06 Hyper Pro, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 06 Hyper Pro uses No data, while Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2 uses Front Wheel Drive.