2008 GT vs CX90 High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
3
6
/
3289 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
17
/
4300
5100 mm
1987
1994 mm
1550
1745 mm
/
3010 mm
545
566 L
/
5 Doors
/
201 m
Fuel Economy
16.8
10.5 Km/L
44
71 L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
❌
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Vinyl Upholstery
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
9.25
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
0.0 L - 1199 L
3.3 L
115 BHP - 155 BHP
345 BHP
AT & Automatic
Automatic
Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 Seater
Exterior
/
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
130
345 BHP
230
500 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
2008 GT
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
CX90 High Plus
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX90 High Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 2008 GT if you care more about fuel economy; choose CX90 High Plus if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 2008 GT has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while CX90 High Plus has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, 2008 GT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 2008 GT has a wheelbase of No data, while CX90 High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 2008 GT uses Front Drive, while CX90 High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.