3008 GT vs Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD Comparison

Car Information

147

/

300

/

/

6.8

Engine / Motor

/

6

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4542

4745

1895

1890

1641

1687

2730

2870

588

/

Fuel Economy

/

13.5

/

58

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

1.6 L - 1.6 L

3.3 L

156 BHP - 300 BHP

280 BHP

Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 6 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6

3.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

180

280 BHP

147

/

6000

/

300

450

4500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 3008 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 3008 GT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | 3008 GT

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Teramont 2022 2.0L Trendline (AWD)

Peugeot | 3008 GT

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD)

Peugeot | 3008 GT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 5008 2022 1.6T GT Line

Peugeot | 3008 GT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 5008 2021 1.6T GT Line

Peugeot | 3008 GT

VS

Nissan | Nissan Xterra 2022 2.5L Titanium (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 3008 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 3008 GT has a wheelbase of 2730 , while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 GT uses No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.