408 GT vs Explorer 2025 Active 200A Comparison

Car Information

8.2

6.8

158

/

300

/

Engine / Motor

/

180

/

4

Dimensions

5

7

4687

5049

1848

2004

1486

1775

2787

3025

536

515

/

18

Fuel Economy

/

12.7

/

67

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

13.2

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

10 Speed Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

255/65 R18

/

255/65 R18

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.3 L - 3.5 L

143 BHP - 215

290 BHP - 400 BHP

Automatic

10 Speed Automatic & 10 Speed Selectshift Automatic & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6

2.3

Gasoline

Gasoline

215

300 BHP

158

/

5500

/

300

420

2000

/

/

2.3L EcoBoost L4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 408 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Explorer 2025 Active 200A

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Rollover stability control
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick408 GT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 408 GT if you care more about price; choose Explorer 2025 Active 200A if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | TXL Flagship 2.0T

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Dodge | Durango 3.6L SXT Plus (RWD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2023 1.6T GT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a wheelbase of 3025. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Explorer 2025 Active 200A, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A uses Four-Wheel Drive.