408 GT vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
N/A
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4687
5.075
1848
1.969
1486
1.716
2787
2.930
536
/
Fuel Economy
/
/
/
74
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
143 BHP - 215
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
215
226 BHP
158
/
5500
/
300
420
2000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
408 GT
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick408 GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 408 GT if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 408 GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.