4C Spider vs C 43 AMG 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
258 km/h
250 km/h
/
4
/
1990 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
2 Seater
5 Seater
3989 mm
4,751 mm
2090 mm
1,820 mm
1183 mm
1,438 mm
2380 mm
2865 mm
110 L
/
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
10.2 Km/L
10.6
40 L
66
10.2 Km/L
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
9-speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.8 L
2.0 T
Gasoline
Hybrid
240 BHP
408 BHP
350 Nm
500 Nm
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L turbocharged inline-4 + mild hybrid (48 V)
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Key Spec
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
Comparison of configuration highlights
4C Spider
- ABS
C 43 AMG 4MATIC
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC 43 AMG 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 4C Spider if you care more about overall equipment; choose C 43 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 4C Spider has a fuel consumption of 9.8, while C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 9.43. Therefore, C 43 AMG 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 4C Spider has a wheelbase of 2380 mm, while C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2865 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C 43 AMG 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 4C Spider uses Rear Wheel Drive, while C 43 AMG 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.