A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
233 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4939 mm
4949 mm
1886 mm
1880 mm
1457 mm
1480 mm
2924 mm
2961 mm
530 L
540 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
16.7 Km/L
9 Km/L
63 L
66 L
16.7 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
180 BHP - 560 BHP
204 BHP - 285 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
285 BHP
320 Nm
420 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
A6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickA6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) if you care more about price; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.99, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a wheelbase of 2924 mm, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.