All-New Duster LE 1.6L 4×2 CVT vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5
7
1235
/
17
19
4341
4810
2052
1925
1693
1742
1785
/
478
/
5.07
/
491
/
/
2800
Fuel Economy
50
/
/
13
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
6
Infotainment
7
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Drum
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
-
105 BHP - 135 BHP
254 - 254
Automatic & CVT & Manual
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115
254
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
/
390
Technologies
✓
/
✓
Eco + Normal + Sport
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
All-New Duster LE 1.6L 4×2 CVT
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAll-New Duster LE 1.6L 4×2 CVT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose All-New Duster LE 1.6L 4×2 CVT if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, All-New Duster LE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, All-New Duster LE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. All-New Duster LE 1.6L 4×2 CVT uses No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.