Alsvin 1.5L Advanced vs Mazda 6 2018 2.5L Prestige Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4390 mm
4.850
1725 mm
1.840
1468 mm
1.450
2535 mm
2.830
500 L
419
/
✓
Fuel Economy
13 Km/L
12.2
45 L
62
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
105 BHP - 105 BHP
151 BHP - 231 BHP
Automatic & DCT
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
105 BHP
188 BHP
145 Nm
256
Motor
/
N/A
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Alsvin 1.5L Advanced
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Mazda 6 2018 2.5L Prestige Plus
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlsvin 1.5L Advanced
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Alsvin 1.5L Advanced if you care more about price; choose Mazda 6 2018 2.5L Prestige Plus if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Alsvin 1.5L Advanced has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while Mazda 6 2018 2.5L Prestige Plus has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Alsvin 1.5L Advanced is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Alsvin 1.5L Advanced has a wheelbase of 2535 mm, while Mazda 6 2018 2.5L Prestige Plus has a wheelbase of 2.830. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alsvin 1.5L Advanced, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Alsvin 1.5L Advanced uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda 6 2018 2.5L Prestige Plus uses Front Wheel Drive.