ALTIMA S 2.5L vs SU7 RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1440
/
16
/
4
4 Doors
4900
4997 mm
1852
1963 mm
2825
3000 mm
/
1455 mm
/
517 L
Fuel Economy
16.4
/
61
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
5
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
16.1
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
CVTS
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Independent Strut Front Suspension
/
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Vented Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
/
179 BHP - 270 BHP
295 BHP - 673 BHP
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
TBD
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
668 km - 800 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
DOHC
/
4
/
188 BHP
295 BHP
188hp @ 6000 rpm
/
244
400 Nm
244 Nm torque @ 3600 rpm
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
10
/
options.Lithium
Comparison of configuration highlights
ALTIMA S 2.5L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
SU7 RWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ALTIMA S 2.5L if you care more about overall equipment; choose SU7 RWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while SU7 RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2825, while SU7 RWD has a wheelbase of 3000 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, SU7 RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ALTIMA S 2.5L uses Front Drive, while SU7 RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.