ALTIMA SL 2.5L vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
260 km/h
/
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1500/1553
/
19
/
4
4 Doors
4900
4949 mm
1852
1880 mm
2825
2961 mm
/
1480 mm
/
540 L
Fuel Economy
16.4-17.6
9 Km/L
61
66 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
✓
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather Appointed
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags Seat-mounted side-impact supplemental air bags for front- and rear-seat outboard occupants Roof-mounted curtain side-impact supplemental air bags with rollover sensor for front-and rear-seat outboard occupant head protection
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
✓
BOSE
/
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Independent Strut Front Suspension
/
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Vented Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
179 BHP - 270 BHP
204 BHP - 285 BHP
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DOHC
/
4
4
188 BHP
285 BHP
188hp @ 6000 rpm
/
244/380
420 Nm
244 Nm torque @ 3600 rpm
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
L1
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ALTIMA SL 2.5L
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ALTIMA SL 2.5L if you care more about price; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ALTIMA SL 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, ALTIMA SL 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ALTIMA SL 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2825, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ALTIMA SL 2.5L uses Front Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.