Ambition vs Edge Ambient Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186
200 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16"
/
4225
4795 mm
1975
2179 mm
1612
1735 mm
2651
2850 mm
1531
/
1516
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
16.8
7.2 Km/L
/
69 L
/
7.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
ESC
/
ABS
✓
TCS/ASR
/
ESC
/
Infotainment
8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Electronic Differential Locking System
/
Automatic 6-speed
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.0 TSI
/
115 hp
250 BHP
115/5,000-5,500
/
175
377 Nm
178/1,750–4,500
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 3.7 L
/
250 BHP - 335 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ambition
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Rollover stability control
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Edge Ambient
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEdge Ambient
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ambition if you care more about fuel economy; choose Edge Ambient if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ambition has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Edge Ambient has a fuel consumption of 13.89. Therefore, Ambition is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ambition has a wheelbase of 2651, while Edge Ambient has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Edge Ambient, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ambition uses Front Drive, while Edge Ambient uses Front Wheel Drive.