Arkana Evolution vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
205
161 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1351
/
17
/
4568
4341 mm
2034
1804 mm
1576
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
50
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All
/
Safety
Front Airbags (Passenger Side With Deactivation), Curtains And Front Side Airbags.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
7-Speed Dual-Clutch Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.3 L
1.6 L - 1998 L
155 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
7-Speed Dual Clutch & 7-Speed Dual-Clutch Automatic Transmission
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.3 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
155 BHP
115 BHP
262
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Arkana Evolution
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Seatbelt pretensioner
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Arkana Evolution if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Arkana Evolution has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Arkana Evolution has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Arkana Evolution uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.