ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs HS3 1.5T Luxury Comparison

Car Information

/

9.9

/

124

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

195

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4355 mm

4655

1810 mm

1900

1625 mm

1668

2670 mm

2770

358 L

/

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

18.7

63 L

/

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

8

Transmission

/

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

235/55R18

/

235/55R18

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

150 BHP

166 BHP - 248 BHP

Automatic & CVT

7DCT & 8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5T

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

166 BHP

197 Nm

258

/

Direct Injection+Turbo Charging

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • HS3 1.5T Luxury

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose HS3 1.5T Luxury if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion 2023 1.5T Active Plus

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2018 2.4L FWD

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

MG | MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

MG | HS 1.5 DCT DEL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while HS3 1.5T Luxury has a fuel consumption of 5.35. Therefore, HS3 1.5T Luxury is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while HS3 1.5T Luxury has a wheelbase of 2770. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS3 1.5T Luxury, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while HS3 1.5T Luxury uses Front Wheel Drive.