ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

210

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4355 mm

4549

1810 mm

1860

1625 mm

1689

2670 mm

2734

358 L

/

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

14.9

63 L

/

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.0 L

150 BHP

216 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

216 BHP

197 Nm

325

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about overall equipment; choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2019 3.8L GLS 5 Door high

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2018 3.8L 5 Door Full

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion 2024 1.5T High Deluxe

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Audi | Audi Q2 2023 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.