ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

240 km/h

/

6

/

3492 cc

/

Japanese

Dimensions

5 Seater

8 Seater

4355 mm

5350 mm

1810 mm

2030 mm

1625 mm

1955 mm

2670 mm

3075 mm

358 L

836 L

/

5 Doors

/

253 m

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

/

63 L

97 L

12.5 Km/L

7.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.3

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

150 - 150

275 BHP - 495 BHP

Automatic & CVT

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

425 BHP

197 Nm

700 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Outstanding off-road performance
  • Outstanding engine power
  • Spacious and luxurious interior design

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Slow electronic system response

Related comparisons

Editor's PickASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L has a wheelbase of 3075 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L uses Four Wheel Drive .