ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Jetour X50 Flagship Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
193 km/h
/
/
1498
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4355 mm
4397
1810 mm
1841
1625 mm
1654
2670 mm
2601
358 L
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
/
63 L
/
12.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Faux Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
6-DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
Macpherson independent suspension
/
Multiple link independent suspension
/
EPS
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
Ventilated
/
Disc
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L
150 - 150
154 BHP - 156
Automatic & CVT
6-DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
156
197 Nm
230
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Jetour X50 Flagship
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and striking exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Reliable and consistent performance
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- The infotainment system is outdated
- Limited engine choices
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technologies for security systems
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average fuel efficiency
- The availability of spare parts can be limited
- Less dynamic driving experience
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJetour X50 Flagship
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about interior space; choose Jetour X50 Flagship if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Jetour X50 Flagship has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Jetour X50 Flagship has a wheelbase of 2601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Jetour X50 Flagship uses Front Drive.