B10 510 Comfort vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4515
4341 mm
1885
1804 mm
1655
1693 mm
2735
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
180 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
180 BHP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
B10 510 Comfort
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose B10 510 Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, B10 510 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, B10 510 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2735, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, B10 510 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. B10 510 Comfort uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.