Baleno 1.5L GL vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200
4
/
1462 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
965/985
/
15
/
4
/
3990
4689
1745
1801
1500
1415
2520
,735
355 L
/
150
/
Fuel Economy
22.7
/
37 L
47
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
SRS front
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
4AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1373 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
91 BHP - 103 BHP
123 BHP - 180 BHP
4AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
103 BHP
150
138
181
/
112
/
6400
/
5000
Technologies
✓
✓
Auto
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Baleno 1.5L GL
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- A budget-friendly price
- Stylish exterior design
Negative
- Power performance on highways is limited
- The quality of interior materials is modest
- Sound insulation can be improved
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBaleno 1.5L GL
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Baleno 1.5L GL if you care more about price; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Baleno 1.5L GL has a fuel consumption of 4.41, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Baleno 1.5L GL has a wheelbase of 2520, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Baleno 1.5L GL, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Baleno 1.5L GL uses Front Drive, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.