BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4752
4.314
1918
1.809
1621
1.624
2864
2.585
500
448
/
✓
Fuel Economy
13.7
17.2
67
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
245 BHP - 354 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
252 BHP
112 BHP
350
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive design
- Powerful engine performance
- Advanced in cabin technology
Negative
- Limited space for rear seats
- High operating cost
- The control system may be complicated for some users
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i has a fuel consumption of 7.3, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i has a wheelbase of 2864, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BMW X4 2024 xDrive 30i uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.