C 43 AMG 4MATIC vs Continental GT 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
318 km/h
4
/
1990 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
4,751 mm
4850 mm
1,820 mm
1966 mm
1,438 mm
1405 mm
2865 mm
2851 mm
/
358 L
Fuel Economy
10.6
9.4 Km/L
66
90 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
6.0 L
TBD
500 BHP - 626 BHP
TBD
Automatic
TBD
Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 T
6.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged inline-4 + mild hybrid (48 V)
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
408 BHP
542 BHP
500 Nm
770 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C 43 AMG 4MATIC
Continental GT 4.0T V8
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickContinental GT 4.0T V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C 43 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Continental GT 4.0T V8 if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 9.43, while Continental GT 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, C 43 AMG 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2865 mm, while Continental GT 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 2851 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C 43 AMG 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 43 AMG 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Continental GT 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.