C 43 AMG 4MATIC vs Toyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport Comparison
Car Information
4.6-4.7
/
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210
4
4
1990 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4,751 mm
4425
1,820 mm
1780
1,438 mm
1430
2865 mm
2700
/
543
Fuel Economy
10.6
11.1
66
55
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
2.5 L
TBD
176 BHP
TBD
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 T
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged inline-4 + mild hybrid (48 V)
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
408 BHP
176 BHP
500 Nm
230
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C 43 AMG 4MATIC
Toyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickToyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C 43 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Toyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 9.43, while Toyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Toyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C 43 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2865 mm, while Toyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C 43 AMG 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 43 AMG 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Toyota Zelas 2015 2.5L Sport uses Front Wheel Drive.