C200 vs i3 120 Ah Comparison

Car Information

7.3

/

Engine / Motor

246 km/h

160 km/h

4

/

1998 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

4 Seater

4 Doors

/

4751 mm

4011 mm

1820 mm

1775 mm

1437 mm

1598 mm

2,865 mm

2570 mm

540 L

260 L

118 m

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

66 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Smart Entry

/

✓

/

Interior

✓

/

✓

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Manual

/

✓

/

✓

/

Standard

/

Safety

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

10.6

/

✓

/

✓

/

Android LCD

/

8

/

Transmission

9-speed Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

TBD

184 BHP

TBD

TBD

TBD

Electric

TBD

/

TBD

4 Seater

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

LED

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

Single Turbo

/

4

/

204 BHP

184 BHP

310 Nm

270 Nm

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • C200

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • i3 120 Ah

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Picki3 120 Ah

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose C200 if you care more about interior space; choose i3 120 Ah if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, C200 has a fuel consumption of 10, while i3 120 Ah has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, C200 has a wheelbase of 2,865 mm, while i3 120 Ah has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C200 , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C200 uses Rear Wheel Drive, while i3 120 Ah uses Rear Wheel Drive.