Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
185 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4160
4440 mm
1810
1833 mm
1670
1560 mm
2560
2700 mm
348
330 L
Fuel Economy
13.9
13.5 Km/L
52
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1598 L
/
123 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
123 BHP
130 BHP
160
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable
- Keyless Entry
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2560, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS Sport 1.8L Classic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2016 Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.