Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) vs Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
/
SUV/
8.2
Engine / Motor
180
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4160
4760
1810
1907
1670
1700
2560
2870
348
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
12.7
52
64
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
123 BHP
224 BHP - 252 BHP
Automatic
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
123 BHP
224 BHP
160
340
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2560, while Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS35 2018 1.6L Luxury (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.