Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
185 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4949
4624 mm
1930
1860 mm
1790
1681 mm
2810
2718 mm
/
5 Doors
/
841 L
Fuel Economy
10.5
9.9 Km/L
74
60 L
/
9.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.4 L - 3.2 L
233 BHP
184 BHP - 272 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
233 BHP
271 BHP
360
324 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCherokee 3.2L Longitude
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.