Changan Eado 2016 Elite vs Stelvio Veloce Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
230 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4620
4680 mm
1820
2160 mm
1490
1670 mm
2660
2818 mm
510
525 L
Fuel Economy
13.9
11.2 Km/L
52
64 L
/
11.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L - 2.9 L
124 BHP
280 BHP - 510 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
124 BHP
280 BHP
160
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan Eado 2016 Elite
- Keyless Entry
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Stelvio Veloce
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan Eado 2016 Elite
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan Eado 2016 Elite if you care more about price; choose Stelvio Veloce if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan Eado 2016 Elite has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Stelvio Veloce has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, Changan Eado 2016 Elite is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan Eado 2016 Elite has a wheelbase of 2660, while Stelvio Veloce has a wheelbase of 2818 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stelvio Veloce, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan Eado 2016 Elite uses Front Wheel Drive, while Stelvio Veloce uses All Wheel Drive.