CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) vs Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
218 km/h
4
4
1790 cc
1498 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4390 mm
4191 mm
1795 mm
1794 mm
1565 mm
1508 mm
2640 mm
2601 mm
/
405 L
/
185 m
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
12 Km/L
43 L
50 L
16 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
Electric
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
7
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
6
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
1.0 L - 1.5 L
96 BHP - 121 BHP
116 BHP - 150 BHP
CVT
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.8 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
/
4
4
96 BHP
148 BHP
142 Nm
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) if you care more about price; choose Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.25, while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a wheelbase of 2640 mm, while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic has a wheelbase of 2601 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic uses Front Wheel Drive.