CLE 300 4MATIC Coupé vs Challenger 3.6L GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
200 km/h
4
/
1999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
1,855
/
2 Doors
2 Doors
4850 mm
5027 mm
1,861 mm
1923 mm
1,423 mm
1460 mm
2865 mm
2950 mm
353 L
459 L
Fuel Economy
14 Km/L
9.8 Km/L
66 L
70 L
10 Km/L
9.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
201 BHP - 449 hp
300 BHP - 797 BHP
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 - 4
2 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
255 BHP
305 BHP
190
/
400 Nm
363 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CLE 300 4MATIC Coupé
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
Challenger 3.6L GT
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChallenger 3.6L GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CLE 300 4MATIC Coupé if you care more about fuel economy; choose Challenger 3.6L GT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CLE 300 4MATIC Coupé has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, CLE 300 4MATIC Coupé is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CLE 300 4MATIC Coupé has a wheelbase of 2865 mm, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Challenger 3.6L GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CLE 300 4MATIC Coupé uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Challenger 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.