Commander Limited Plus vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
240 km/h
/
6
/
3500 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
8 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
5334 mm
/
2006 mm
/
1930 mm
/
3111 mm
/
530 L
/
250 m
Fuel Economy
/
11 Km/L
/
88 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
12
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0
3.5 L - 5.4 L
272
300 BHP - 440
TBD
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
272
380 BHP
400
637 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Commander Limited Plus
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Editor's PickExpedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Commander Limited Plus if you care more about overall equipment; choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Commander Limited Plus has a fuel consumption of No data, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Commander Limited Plus has a wheelbase of No data, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Commander Limited Plus uses No data, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.