Commander Overland vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
/
4490 mm
/
1874 mm
/
1613 mm
/
2750 mm
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10
/
✓
/
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0
/
272
153 BHP - 305 BHP
TBD
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
7
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
/
Gasoline
Electric
272
153 BHP
400
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Commander Overland
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Commander Overland if you care more about power; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Commander Overland has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Commander Overland has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Commander Overland uses No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.