CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs H7 Top 2026 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4705
1765
1908
1535
1780
2570
/
Fuel Economy
15.3
/
48 LITRES
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
10
/
14.6
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
9-Speed Dual-Clutch Transmission
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
/
235/60 R19
/
235/60 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
/
110 BHP - 148 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
234
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
/
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
(AUTO, STANDARD, SPORT, ECO, SNOW, MUD, SAND , GRASS/GRAVEL, UNEVEN
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
H7 Top 2026
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 Top 2026
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about overall equipment; choose H7 Top 2026 if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while H7 Top 2026 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while H7 Top 2026 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while H7 Top 2026 uses No data.