CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD vs Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
218 km/h
/
4
/
1498 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215 / 60 / R16
/
4275
4191 mm
1765
1794 mm
1535
1508 mm
2570
2601 mm
/
5 Doors
/
405 L
/
185 m
Fuel Economy
15.3
12 Km/L
48 LITRES
50 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Dynamic Stability Control
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
1.4 L
147 BHP - 148 BHP
150 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
148 HP
148 BHP
148 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
192
250 Nm
192 NM @ 2800 RPM
/
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Speed Alert
Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a fuel consumption of 6.54, while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD has a wheelbase of 2570, while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic has a wheelbase of 2601 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-3 2.0L GT 2WD uses No data, while Q2 35 TFSI tiptronic uses Front Wheel Drive.