CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI vs CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

192 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

235/50 R20

/

4740

4395 mm

1890

1795 mm

1688

1562 mm

2870

2655 mm

/

430 L

Fuel Economy

15.4

16.7 Km/L

58

48 L

/

16.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Rear View Camera

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Passive Collision Signal: Hazard + Brake

/

/

/

/

Speed Alert DSA: Display Only

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.3 L

2.0 L - 2.5 L

280 BHP - 284 BHP

155 BHP - 189 BHP

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

Piano Black Honey-Comb

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Rear Bumper Guard

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

3.3L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

e-SKYACTIVG INLINE 6-CYLINDER TURBO (MILDHYBRID)

/

280 HP

155 BHP

284 PS @ 5000 RPM

/

450

200 Nm

450 NM @ 2000 RPM

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX30 2.0L Elite 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI if you care more about interior space; choose CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI has a wheelbase of 2870, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX-60 MHEV 3.3 TURBO AWD AZAMI uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CX30 2.0L Elite 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.