CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
185 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4550 mm
4624 mm
1840 mm
1860 mm
1675 mm
1681 mm
2700 mm
2718 mm
506 L
841 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.3 Km/L
9.9 Km/L
58 L
60 L
14.3 Km/L
9.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2500 L
2.4 L - 3.2 L
188 BHP - 190 BHP
184 BHP - 272 BHP
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
188 BHP
271 BHP
251 Nm
324 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 2.5L GT (AWD)
- ABS
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCherokee 3.2L Longitude
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 2.5L GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.