CX5 Entry vs Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

210

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

17

/

4550

4549

1840

1860

1675

1689

2700

2734

965

/

Fuel Economy

/

14.9

56

/

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.9 L - 2.5 L

2.0 L

151 BHP - 190 BHP

216 BHP

6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

190 BHP

216 BHP

251 Nm

325

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 Entry

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
  • Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCX5 Entry

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price; choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Renault | Renault Koleos 2023 2.5L LE (4WD)

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Geely | Geely Monjaro 2024 2.0TD Premium GF (4WD)

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort

Mazda | CX5 Entry

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.