CX5 Entry vs Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4550
4745
1840
1890
1675
1687
2700
2870
965
/
Fuel Economy
/
13.5
56
58
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
6
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2500 L
3.3 L
188 BHP - 190 BHP
280 BHP
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
280 BHP
251 Nm
450
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose CX5 Entry if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 Entry uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX-60 2023 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.