CX5 High vs Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort Comparison

Car Information

252

/

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

19 Inch

16

4550 mm

4200

1840 mm

1760

1680 mm

1570

2700 mm

2555

965 L

341

/

Flush Door

/

5

Fuel Economy

/

/

58

/

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Cloth

/

/

Safety

6

Dual Front Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12 Inch

10.25

/

/

10

4

/

/

/

Transmission

6-Speed Automatic

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

Key Spec

2.5 L - 2500 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

188 BHP - 190 BHP

109 BHP - 113

6-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

190 BHP

111 BHP

251 Nm

/

/

1.5L

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

ECO, Normal

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • CX5 High

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose CX5 High if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

MG | MG RX8 2024 2.0T LUX (AWD)

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Opel | Opel Grandland X 2024 1.6T Highline

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Mazda | CX5 High

VS

Toyota | RAV4 XLE 4X4 HEV

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, CX5 High has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, CX5 High has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX5 High, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. CX5 High uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive.