Defender 90 SE (P300) vs EC6 Standard Range Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
191 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
4 Doors
4583 mm
4849
2008 mm
1995
1969 mm
1697
2587 mm
2888 mm
397 L
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
88 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5.0 L
/
300 BHP - 517 BHP
490 BHP
Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 8 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
V
/
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
300 BHP
490 BHP
400 Nm
550 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Defender 90 SE (P300)
EC6 Standard Range
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDefender 90 SE (P300)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about price; choose EC6 Standard Range if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10, while EC6 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm, while EC6 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EC6 Standard Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive, while EC6 Standard Range uses All Wheel Drive .