DFSK C32 Standard vs DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1172
/
14"
/
4940
5265 mm
1655
1870 mm
1910
1785 mm
3050
3125 mm
2060x1540x370
/
/
/
2295
/
Fuel Economy
18
12.5 Km/L
/
72 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
Manual
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Macpherson Independent Suspension
/
Five-bar Rear Non-independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Drum
/
175 R14 LT
/
175 R14 LT
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
3.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Naturally Aspirated
/
114
190 BHP
/
450 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.9 L - 3.0 L
/
79 BHP - 190 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel
/
TBD
/
3 Seater - 5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
DFSK C32 Standard
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose DFSK C32 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, DFSK C32 Standard has a fuel consumption of 5.56, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, DFSK C32 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, DFSK C32 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT has a wheelbase of 3125 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. DFSK C32 Standard uses Rear Drive, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT uses Four Wheel Drive.