E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon vs Baleno 1.5L GL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1462 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,959
3990
2,065
1745
1,468
1500
2,961
2520
/
965/985
/
15
/
4
/
355 L
/
150
Fuel Economy
/
22.7
60
37 L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
SRS front
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
9-speed automatic
4AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
449 + 163 HP
103 BHP
560 + 480
138
Motor
480
/
Lithium-ion/21.2
/
Key Spec
/
1.5 L - 1373 L
/
91 BHP - 103 BHP
/
4AT & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
Auto
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon
Baleno 1.5L GL
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBaleno 1.5L GL
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon if you care more about fuel economy; choose Baleno 1.5L GL if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a fuel consumption of 1.0–0.9, while Baleno 1.5L GL has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a wheelbase of 2,961, while Baleno 1.5L GL has a wheelbase of 2520. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon uses No data, while Baleno 1.5L GL uses Front Drive.