E200 2.0L vs 220i Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
4432
1880 mm
1984
1480 mm
1418
2961 mm
2690
540 L
390
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
5.9
66 L
52
10 Km/L
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
-
204 BHP - 402
140 - 241
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
7-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission (7DCT) & 8-speed automatic transmission (8AT) & Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
204 BHP
184 BHP
320 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
E200 2.0L
220i
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick220i
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E200 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy; choose 220i if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E200 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 10, while 220i has a fuel consumption of 16.95. Therefore, E200 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E200 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm, while 220i has a wheelbase of 2690. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E200 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E200 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive, while 220i uses Rear Drive.