E300 3.0L vs CT5 V 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
250 km/h
4
6
2998 cc
2998 cc
GCC
American
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
4949 mm
4922
1880 mm
2039
1480 mm
1452
2961 mm
2946
540 L
336 L
/
102
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
8 Km/L
66 L
64 L
9 Km/L
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
Dual Zone
✓
Electric
✓
Bucket
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
10
✓
Android LCD
✓
15
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
10-speed automatic transmission
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
3.0 L - 6.2 L
204 BHP - 402
360 BHP - 668 BHP
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
10-speed automatic transmission
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
3.0 L
3.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
285 BHP
360 BHP
420 Nm
550 Nm
/
Turbocharge
/
V6 engine
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
CT5 V 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy; choose CT5 V 2025 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while CT5 V 2025 has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, E300 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm, while CT5 V 2025 has a wheelbase of 2946. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while CT5 V 2025 uses Rear Wheel Drive.