EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) vs H2 1.5T Intelligent Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
170 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
4335 mm
1874 mm
1814 mm
1613 mm
1695 mm
2750 mm
2560 mm
/
500 L
Fuel Economy
/
12.2 Km/L
/
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
/
TBD
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
305 BHP
148 BHP
680 Nm
210 Nm
/
1.5 L
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
H2 1.5T Intelligent
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive.