EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters vs Land Cruiser GXR3 Comparison

Car Information

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

/

Engine / Motor

N/A, Electric

6

Dimensions

7 Seater

7

5209

5115

2010

1980

1731

1945

3110

/

/

20

Fuel Economy

/

10.1

/

110

Comfort

/

All Doors

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

/

Passenger Door

/

Hi Fabric

/

/

Dual

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front + Knee + Side + Curtain

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

12.3

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode

/

Central And Rear

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)

Wheels/brakes

/

/

265/55 R20

/

265/55 R20

Key Spec

TBD

/

429 BHP - 543 BHP

232 BHP - 409

Automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Electric

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

320 km

/

6 - 7 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

/

3.3 L - 5.7 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

0.0 L

3.5

Electric

Gasoline

429 BHP

409

600

650

/

V

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Land Cruiser GXR3

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser GXR3

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about power; choose Land Cruiser GXR3 if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Audi | Audi Q5 2024 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Genesis | Genesis GV80 2021 2.5T Prestige

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

BMW | BMW X4 2022 xDrive 30i

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

BMW | BMW X4 2021 xDrive 30i

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

BMW | BMW X4 2020 xDrive 30i

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a fuel consumption of 9.9. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser GXR3 uses Four-Wheel Drive.