Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi vs A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
233 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4
/
4710
4939 mm
1825
1886 mm
1430
1457 mm
2720
2924 mm
/
530 L
Fuel Economy
/
16.7 Km/L
/
63 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson strut type
/
Coupled torsion beam axle / Multi-Link(N Line)
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.8 L - 4.0 L
103 - 159 BHP
180 BHP - 560 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
190 BHP
155
320 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
A6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickElantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi if you care more about price; choose A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a fuel consumption of No data, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a wheelbase of 2720, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a wheelbase of 2924 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi uses No data, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.