ELEVATION AWD 2.0L vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4,597
4545 mm
1,892
1856 mm
1,672–1,680
1668 mm
2,730
2680 mm
/
470 L
Fuel Economy
9–10
14.7 Km/L
59
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Safety
forward
/
BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9 speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson-strut
/
Four-link independent
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.6 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
170 BHP - 301 BHP
165 BHP - 248
8 speed AT & 9 speed AT & Automatic & CVT
8AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
✓
/
252 hp
165 BHP
433 N·m
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ELEVATION AWD 2.0L
- Rear Camera
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickELEVATION AWD 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ELEVATION AWD 2.0L if you care more about price; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, GS4 1.5T GB is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ELEVATION AWD 2.0L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.