EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC vs Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
197 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4684 mm
5110 mm
2020 mm
1925 mm
1667 mm
1847 mm
2,829 mm
3043 mm
495 L
487 L
Fuel Economy
/
9.5 Km/L
/
93 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
288 BHP
290 BHP
520 Nm
353 Nm
/
3.6 L
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium
/
215 kW
/
Key Spec
/
3.6 L - 5.7 L
/
290 BHP - 360 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDurango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a wheelbase of 3043 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.