EQE 350+ vs EQS 580 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
220 km/h
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4946 mm
5216 mm
1,906 mm
2103 mm
1503 mm
1503 mm
3120 mm
3120 mm
430 L
430 L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
288 BHP
525 BHP
565 Nm
855 Nm
Motor
10
9
options.Lithium-ion
options.Lithium
215 kW
385 kW
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 350+
EQS 580 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 580 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 350+ if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQS 580 4MATIC if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 350+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQS 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 350+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while EQS 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3120 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 350+ uses Rear Wheel Drive, while EQS 580 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.