EQE 350 4MATIC SUV vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2,580
/
4,863
4341 mm
1,940
1804 mm
1,685
1693 mm
3,030
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
288
115 BHP
215
/
765
156 Nm
/
1.6 L
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 1998 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQE 350 4MATIC SUV
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQE 350 4MATIC SUV if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQE 350 4MATIC SUV has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQE 350 4MATIC SUV has a wheelbase of 3,030, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 350 4MATIC SUV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQE 350 4MATIC SUV uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.